Pete Young (peteyoung) wrote,
Pete Young
peteyoung

Lives of Photographs, 53.1

big red button

Reasons to dislike Royalty Free licensing #5,741: Here's a photo I took in a San Francisco diner a few years ago (Lori's Diner on Market St., if you must know). Last year Getty Images got round to licensing it, and put it up for sale as a 'royalty free' image. No problem with me so far, if a sale is for 'end use' and the image is not sold on further. But for the last couple of months this photo has been bought on a monthly basis by Fine Art America, who pay Getty $78 each time, with the creator getting 20% (in this case $15). Fine Art America then put the image up for sale on their website in several formats, the most expensive of which is an acrylic print going for $90 ...and I get precisely 0% on any further sale of my image. I know plenty of stories like this, some of which have the 'royalty free' photographer/artist missing out on substantial sums of money that would feed their families for years. AFAIK there's nothing illegal in what's being done, but can I just say, IT SUCKS.
Tags: getty, lives of photographs, photography
Subscribe

  • Lives in passing: Harry Harrison, 1925 - 2012

    R.I.P. Harry Harrison. I met Harry three times (although I was hardly on first name terms with him): once at Novacon, where I bought him a pint; once…

  • Lives in passing: Buddy, January 2011 - 2 July 2012

    Our one-and-a-half year old Pomeranian/Samoyed crossbreed was attacked and killed by a couple of street dogs this morning, the same dogs Buddy…

  • Go, little book

    "There are plenty of images of women in science fiction. There are hardly any women." Given the recent news about Joanna Russ, this morning I…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 2 comments